Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
SULLIVAN v. NICHOLS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff: GEORGE E SULLIVAN, II
Defendant: HARVEY NICHOLS, WIPO and SIR DICKSON POON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Poon v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
as 23-1838
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHI-SANG POON
Defendant / Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Chan v. Baker, Jr., et al
as 22-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIMON CHAN, Former Employee of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and SIMON WAI CHAN, Former Employee of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JAMEY TESLER, Secretary & CEO of Massachusetts Department of Transportation, STEVE POFTAK, General Manager of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, MBTA and Vice-chair of the Fiscal Management & Control Board, FMCB and others
Poon v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11468
Plaintiff: Chi-Sang Poon
Defendant: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Latimore v. Poon
as 21-1233
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Correctional Staff, DAVID CLANCY, MCI Norfolk, WILLIAM J. GROSSI, Director of Security, MCI Norfolk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON K. LATIMORE
Defendant / Appellee: VINCENT POON, MCI Norfolk
Chan v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11449
Defendant: Vince Poon, Stephanie Pollack, Charlie Baker and others
Plaintiff: Simon Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Latimore v. Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv13481
Plaintiff: Jason Latimore
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Poon, Pontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?