Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Mosley v. Layton et al
as 2:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Aceon Deon Mosley
Defendant:
Justin D. Layton, Raina Martin, Letitia Dawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Porter
as 6:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Donte Porter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Porter v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Porter
Defendant:
The Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast and Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Sports & Social [ECI]
as 4:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Rachel A. Porter
Defendant:
Sports & Social [ECI]
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crockett v. Columbia Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Kendall Wayne Crockett
Defendant:
Columbia Public Schools, Brian Yearwood, Helen Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter v. Overland Police Department
as 4:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
James Cole Porter
Defendant:
Overland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Patricia Porter
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Porter v. Ludwick
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mikal R Porter and Mikel R. Porter
Defendant:
Unknown Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
