Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, Joshua Branch and B. Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Adrian Porter
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, R. Langford and Joshua Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lauter v. Katoskie et al
as 2:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Joseph John Katoskie, III, Kamala Lanetti, George Schaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Webb v. Porter
as 1:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Major Mike Webb
Defendant:
Bryan Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Porter v. Rodriguez-Salguero
as 1:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WAYNE PORTER
Defendant:
SELBER OMAR RODRIGUEZ-SALGUERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
