Cases 1 - 10 of 11
YUSON v. AMATO et al
as 3:2021cv04481
Defendant:
ELECTROCORE, INC., FRANCIS R. AMATO, DAVID M. RUBIN and others
Plaintiff:
ERWIN YUSON
MALTZ v. AMATO et al
as 3:2021cv04135
Defendant:
ELECTROCORE, INC., FRANCIS R. AMATO, DAVID M. RUBIN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MALTZ
PRIEWE v. ELECTROCORE, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv19653
Defendant:
ELECTROCORE, INC., FRANCIS R. AMATO, DAVID M. RUBIN and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PRIEWE
PRIEWE v. ELECTROCORE, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv19653
Defendant:
ELECTROCORE, INC., FRANCIS R. AMATO, DAVID M. RUBIN and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PRIEWE
TURNOFSKY v. ELECTROCORE, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv18400
Defendant:
BTIG, LLC, ELECTROCORE, INC., FRANCIS R. AMATO and others
Plaintiff:
ALLYN TURNOFSKY
Petitioner:
Brian R. Garcia, Erwin Yuson, JAMES PRIEWE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
POSNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv13897
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ESTHER M. POSNER
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKS et al v. NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and KENNETH POSNER
Defendant:
NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DANIEL PANTALEO, HON. JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. POSNER
as 3:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ALAN POSNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BRISTOL CAPITAL, INC.. v. POSNER et al
as 2:2010cv03598
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL CAPITAL, INC..
Defendant:
LARRY POSNER and ESTATE OF ARTHUR KROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
