Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant: Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Barnes v. Fischer
as 23-729
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee: Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity and others
Defendant: Rick Caron, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility, David Mattoon, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility, A. Southworth, Correctional Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 23-692
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant / Appellee: J. Spinner
Defendant: David Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, Thomas Lavaley, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, John/Jane Doe 1, Acting Deputy Superintendent of Security, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Barnes v. Fischer
as 22-3152
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee: David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity, Theodore Zarniak, Captain; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, Joseph Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner of Facilities Operations; sued in individual capacity, John W. Leclair, Maintenance Superintendent; Upstate C.F.; sued in individual capacity and others
Barnes v. Fischer
as 22-2902
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee: Brian Fischer, Commissioner of DOCCS; sued in individual capacity, David A. Rock, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility; sued in individual capacity, Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Upstate Correctional fAcility; sued in individual capacity and others
Defendant: Joseph Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner of Facilities Operations; sued in individual capacity, John W. Leclair, Maintenance Superintendent; Upstate C.F.; sued in individual capacity, Rick Caron, Electronic Equipment Mechanic; Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 22-2913
Petitioner: Bernabe Encarnacion
Respondent: J. Spinner, Anthony Annucci, Commissioner of DOCCS, Albert Prack, Director, Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program and others
Marhone v. Cassel
as 22-2912
Plaintiff / Appellant: Conrad Marhone
Defendant / Appellee: Correction Officer J. Cassel, Correction Officer of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Wright, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, DSS Keysor, Deputy Superintendent at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: Captain Laporto, Captain at Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Prack v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06211
Plaintiff: Timothy J Prack
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allah v. Perlman
as 21-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wamel Allah
Defendant / Appellee: L. Adams, Orc
Defendant: Kenneth Perlman, Former Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, Jeffery McKoy, Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, L. Woodward, Former Senior Counselor and others
Gutierrez v. Annucci et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00699
Defendant: Joseph P. Bellnier, Brian Fischer, Eight Unknown Named Deputy Commissioners and Designees of Dept. of Corrections & Community Supervision and others
Plaintiff: Oman Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?