Cases 31 - 40 of 311
Davis v. Prator
as 5:2022cv02636
Plaintiff:
Quinton D Davis
Defendant:
Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochelle v. Fertal et al
as 5:2022cv02298
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Rochelle, IV
Defendant:
Kaylee Fertal, Brian Riley, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stringer v. Washington et al
as 5:2022cv02154
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Stringer
Defendant:
C Washington, E R T Riley and Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Prator
as 5:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Foster and Jimmy L Foster
Defendant:
Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill and **Sanctioned/Barred* Lisa Hill
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, T Washington, Charlie Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (DO NOT USE)
Davis v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Rickey Fraiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benard v. Prator
as 5:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Dave Benard
Defendant:
Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Caddo Parish Jail et al
as 5:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kendrell Thomas
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Jail, Steve Prator and Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls et al v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jason E Walls and William Walls
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Ryan Chapman and Stephen W Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Jones et al
as 5:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Cedric Gay
Defendant:
Jones, Steve Prator, John Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
