Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Donald Lowe v. Prison Health Services, et al
as 15-2373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LOWE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and DR. EDELMAN
Christopher Wilson v. Richard Bohjanen, et al
as 15-2108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD BOHJANEN, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Turner v. Horizon et al
as 2:2015cv13241
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Turner
Defendant:
Horizon, Prison Health Services, Inc and Correctional Medical Services
Chester Hardy v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 15-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, JOYCE P. POTTER, LPN, EDELMAN, Dr. and others
McCallum #159269 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
Mark Allan McCallum #159269
Defendant:
Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Prasad et al
as 2:2015cv11424
Plaintiff:
Willie Edwards
Defendant:
Anil Prasad , Ghulam Dastgir and Prison Health Service
Simmons #197744 v. Lafler et al
as 1:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Niko S. Simmons #197744
Defendant:
Blaine Lafler, Mark Tabor, Russel Klatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Rhinehart, et al v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 14-2505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS RHINEHART and DAVID L. RHINEHART, Personal Representatives for the Estate of Kenneth A. Rhinehart
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, B. GARDON, Health Unit Manager, B. CLEMENT, Medical Records and others
Michael Robbins v. John Payne, et al
as 14-2395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ROBBINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PAYNE, Physician's Assistant, JEFFREY C. STIEVE, Medical Doctor, BHAMINI SUDHIR, Medical Doctor and others
Pann #254048 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Pann #254048
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Prison Health Services, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
