Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rumph v. Virginia Probation Parole
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Ernest Rumph
Defendant:
Virginia Probation Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toro v. Rhode Island Department of Probation & Parole et al
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Edson Toro
Defendant:
State of Virginia Probation Department, Rhode Island Department of Probation &Parole, Lynn Borsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lockett v. Kiera et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lockett
Defendant:
Ian Kiera and Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Terry v. Chesterfield Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Allen R. Terry
Defendant:
Chesterfield Probation & Parole and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fairfax County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Fairfax County Probation/Parole and Fairfax County Sheriff Dept.
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kesha Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Circuit Court Fairfax County, VA. et al
as 1:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
Gordon A. Graham
Defendant:
Circuit Court Fairfax County, VA., Hon Judge, Lorraine Horland, Probation Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Circuit Court of Alexandria V.A. et al
as 1:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Gordon A. Graham
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Alexandria V.A., Hon. Chief Judge, Nolan B. Dawkins, Commonwealth Attorney Off and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salahmand v. Anthony et al
as 1:2012cv00493
Petitioner:
Mansour Salahmand
Respondent:
Peggy Anthony, Probation & Parole District 25 and Dept. of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howell v. Commonwealth of Virginia Beach Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Beach Circuit Court, H. Thomas Padrick, Commonwealth Attorney; Ms. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
