Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bradley v. Farley et al
as 4:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Susan McCarthy-Elliott, Debbie Farley, Randall J. Schlegel and others
Plaintiff:
Lester B. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Jarrett et al
as 6:2020cv03141
Defendant:
MO DOC Board of Probation and Parole and Hannah Jarrett
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Jarrett et al
as 6:2019cv03444
Defendant:
MO DOC Board of Probation and Parole and Hannah Jarrett
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuemmeler v. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2019cv04225
Defendant:
Board of Probation and Parole and Christie Loveall
Plaintiff:
Mark R Fuemmeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Missouri Probation and Parole
as 4:2019cv00979
Petitioner:
Clifford L Williams
Respondent:
Missouri Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powers v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 6:2019cv03349
Plaintiff:
Nathan E. Powers
Defendant:
Travis Fleetwood and State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan et al v. MOSOP et al
as 4:2019cv02623
Defendant:
Missouri Parole Board, Probation and Parole, Terri Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Precythe et al
as 2:2019cv04150
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Potter
Defendant:
MO DOC Board of Probation and Parole and Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv04092
Defendant:
Loretta Moss, State of Missouri, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
