Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Lynch v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00028
Plaintiff:
William J. Lynch
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Probation & Parole, Tennessee Board of and District Attorney General's Office
Cole v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Cole
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Charles Traughber, Yusef A. Hakeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
as 3:2012cv00123
Petitioner:
Ralph Diaz
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02030
Petitioner:
Arthur D. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Tennessee Board of Parole & Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tirado v. State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
as 3:2012cv00046
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez Tirado
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tirado v. State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
as 3:2011mc00077
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez Tirado
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mathews v. Knoxville City Police et al
as 3:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
James E Mathews
Defendant:
Knoxville City Police, Joseph P Mattina, Coy Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Johnson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2011cv02962
Plaintiff:
Jacob Meeks
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell and State of Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
