Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Warren v. Heartland Homeowners Association, et al.
as 24-1448
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HEARTLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, TAYLOR ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES and others
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C, Z C C FAMILY TRUST / CAMACHO ROBERTA TRS, WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST and others
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C, Z C C FAMILY TRUST / CAMACHO ROBERTA TRS, WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST and others
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Tate v. Progress Residential LLC
as 2:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L Tate
Defendant:
Progress Residential LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Progress Residential v. Angela Brown
as 20-11284
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELA BROWN, and all other occupants
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL, Borrower 6, LLC (2019-1)
Progress Residential v. Jefferson et al
as 4:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Dezra Jefferson and Vincent Jefferson
Plaintiff:
Progress Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
