Cases filed in Minnesota
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00628
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Grady v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv00866
Plaintiff: Shonacie Grady
Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Albert v. Minnesota Court of Appleals/Justices et al
as 0:2022cv02568
Plaintiff: Kallys Albert, Sr.
Defendant: Minnesota Court of Appeals/Justices, Anoka County Tenth Judicial District Court, Melissa Saterbak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Hydrie et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv01060
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant: Waris Hydrie and Yi Fang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Rithmiller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2019cv02470
Defendant: Jake Thompson and William Rithmiller
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company v. Estate of Bradley D. Stover et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2019cv02536
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant: Casey J. Talberg and Estate of Bradley D. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Dammann et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 0:2015cv03149
Plaintiff: Andrea L. Dammann and May K. Yang
Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?