Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tiffany R. Love v. William Evans et al
as 2:2026cv08146
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R. Love doing business as Petra Publishing doing business as Beelara doing business as Positive Magazine doing business as TRL Media Group doing business as TRL Legal Group
Defendant:
William Evans, Windsong Plantation Homeowners Association, Inc., Dominguez Hills Village Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PATTERSON v. THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE, PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JANUSZ et al v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
LINDA R. JANUSZ
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE CO. , THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION , PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrewsh v. Progressive Drive Insurance
as 3:2016cv01665
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ann Andrewsh
Defendant:
Progressive Drive Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HALL v. THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HALL
Defendant:
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION , PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE, PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buffington v. Progressive Drive Insurance et al
as 1:2008cv02555
Plaintiff:
John H. Buffington and John H. Buffington
Defendant:
Progressive Drive Insurance, Progressive Drive Insurance, Progressive Drive Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
