Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Keaton Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ALVARADO v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAAC ALVARADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW SMOOT and PRUITT TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Erwin Jay Pruitt
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith, Tom Lehman and Cody Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAHMAAN v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-KHAALIQ S. RAHMAAN
Defendant:
DANIELLE PRUITT, SCOTT CHAPMAN, MATHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAHMAAN v. BRADBURY et al
as 1:2022cv01548
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-KHAALIQ SHAHEED RAHMAAN
Defendant:
JARROD BRADBURY, SCOTT CHAPMAN, MATHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pruitt v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
as 2:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Mario Pruitt
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATEL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00758
Defendant:
PIKUL PATEL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
