Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lindbloom v. Manatee Memorial Hospital, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Robert Kelvin Lindbloom
Defendant:
Manatee Memorial Hospital, LLC, Kevin Dilallo, Susan Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Geo Care/Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center et al
as 1:2023cv20029
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Dillard
Defendant:
GEO CARE/ TCFTC Head Nurse, GEO CARE/ TCFTC Psychologist, GEO CARE/ TCFTC Psychiatrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindbloom v. Manatee Memorial Foundation, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02428
Plaintiff:
Robert Kelvin Lindbloom
Defendant:
Manatee Memorial Foundation, Inc., Kevin Dilallo, Susan Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROMERO v. FCI MARIANNA HEALTH SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 5:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHE ROMERO
Defendant:
FCI MARIANNA HEALTH SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR, CHIEF PSYCHOLOGIST, COMMANDER WILKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1 et al
as 5:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1, Facility Operations Supervisor, Chief Psychologist and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathews v. Gambi et al
as 3:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
Carlton Xavier Mathews
Defendant:
Officer Gambi, Chaplain Lester, Psychologist Pual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOURSTAR v. HOOKS
as 5:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR
Defendant:
RAMONA HOOKS, STANLEY MITCHELL, JAMES SIKORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIERNEY v. JOHNSTON et al
as 1:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C TIERNEY
Defendant:
JOHN P JOHNSTON, UNKNOWN PSYCHOLOGIST, UNKNOWN NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Ramsetty et al
as 5:2012cv00682
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall
Defendant:
Psychiatrist Ramsetty and Psychologist Mobed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
