Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SPIVEY v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN A W UNKNOWN, PSYCHOLOGICAL TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. WALKER et al
as 5:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
DONALD CONEWAY, JOHN DOES, ROBERT R LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPIVEY v. JACKSON HIGH MAX PSYCHOLOGIST
as 5:2020cv00200
Respondent:
JACKSON HIGH MAX PSYCHOLOGIST
Petitioner:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLENN v. WICKER et al
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, MESSER, Robert Toole and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MESSER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MORRIS, OFFICER HAMEEM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2019cv00480
Defendant:
WARDEN TRACEY JEFFERSON, PSYCHOLOGIST STEVENSON, OFFICER PATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LOUIS COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demons v. Bernhardt et al
as 1:2017cv04214
Plaintiff:
Marshon Eugene Demons
Defendant:
Steven Bernhardt, David Stevens, Donald Witmyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demons v. Bernhardt et al
as 1:2015cv02774
Plaintiff:
Marshon Eugene Demons
Defendant:
Stephen Bernhardt, David Stevens, Donald Witmyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Jesup FCI Chain of Command et al
as 2:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
Jesup FCI Chain of Command, Anthony Haynes, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weinstein v. Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists et al
as 1:2011cv03471
Plaintiff:
Myron N. Weinstein
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists , Marsha B. Sauls , Linda F. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
