Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Johnson v. Miller
as 23-60199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
George Miller, Sr., individual capacity, Donald Mitchell, individual capacity and Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission
Dobbin Plantersville Water Supply v. Lake
as 23-50215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dobbin Plantersville Water Supply Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter Lake, In his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, Will McAdams, In his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, Lori Cobos, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Rockett Spec Util Dist v. Botkin
as 20-50938
Defendant / Appellee:
Arthur C. D'Andrea, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, City of Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation, Alamo Mission, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rockett Special Utility District
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Rural Water Association
NextEra Engy Captl Holdings, et al v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 20-50160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION SOUTHWEST, L.L.C., LONE STAR TRANSMISSION, L.L.C., NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SHELLY BOTKIN, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity, CHAIRMAN DEANN T. WALKER, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity and COMMISSIONER ARTHUR C. D'ANDREA, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae:
LSP TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS II, L.L.C., TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS, ENTERGY TEXAS, INCORPORATED and others
Crystal Clear Special Utility v. DeAnn Walker, et al
as 20-50043
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDY MARTY MARQUEZ, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, SHELLY BOTKIN, DEANN T. WALKER, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTAL CLEAR SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Crystal Clear Spec Util Dist v. DeAnn Walker, et al
as 19-50556
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDY MARTY MARQUEZ, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, SHELLY BOTKIN, DEANN T. WALKER, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTAL CLEAR SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Not Yet Classified:
LAS COLINAS SAN MARCOS PHASE I, L.L.C.
Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission et al v. The City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dr. James Humber, Freddie Davis, George Miller and others
Defendant:
The Board of Mayor and Commissioners of the City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, Bo Plunk, The City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy Water Supply Corporation v. City of Jourdanton, et al
as 5:2017cv00972
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr., City of Jourdanton, HMSC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
McCoy Water Supply Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Entergy Texas, Incorporated v. Donna Nelson, et al
as 17-50042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ENTERGY TEXAS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA L. NELSON, In her official capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, BRANDY MARTY MARQUEZ, In her official capacity as a Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and KENNETH W. ANDERSON, JR., In his official capacity as a Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant:
TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-60118
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
