Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cytline, LLC, et al v. Public Utility District No. 2, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35324
Plaintiff / Appellant: 509 MINE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, BLOCKTREE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, MINERS UNITED, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellee: BOB BERND, individually and in his official capacity, DOES, 1-10, LARRY SCHAAPMAN, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff: TELCO 214 WHOLESALE SOFTWARE, INC., a Washington corporation and CORSAIR INVESTMENTS WA, LLC, a Washington limited liabiity company
Blocktree Properties, LLC, et al v. Grant County PUD, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35277
Plaintiff / Appellant: 509 MINE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, CORSAIR INVESTMENTS WA, LLC, a Washington limited liabiity company, BLOCKTREE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellee: BOB BERND, individually and in his official capacity, TOM FLINT, individually and in his official capacity, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff: TELCO 214 WHOLESALE SOFTWARE, INC., a Washington corporation
Blocktree Properties LLC et al v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff: WeHash Technology LLP, 509 Mine LLC, Corsair Investments WA LLC and others
Defendant: Bob Bernd, Dale Walker, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cities Insurance Assocation of Washington v. Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00410
Plaintiff: Cities Insurance Assocation of Washington
Defendant: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County and Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited
Counter_claimant: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County
Counter_defendant: Cities Insurance Assocation of Washington
Thirdparty_defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Type: Contract Insurance
O'Neil et al v. Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County et al
as 2:2013cv00158
Plaintiff: Harley D O'Neil , Michele D O'Neil and Estate of Elaine O'Neil
Defendant: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County, Port of Quincy, Port District No 1 of Grant County and Crescent Bar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00584
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
James Kelly, et al v. Port of Quincy, et al
as 12-35700
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES V. KELLY, LAWRENCE H. CAIN, H. TERESA CAIN and others
Defendant: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY and CRESENT BAR INC.
Defendant - Appellant: PORT OF QUINCY, PORT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 OF GRANT COUNTY
James Kelly, et al v. PUDN2GC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35639
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES V. KELLY, LAWRENCE H. CAIN, H. TERESA CAIN and others
Defendant - Appellant: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY
Defendant: PORT OF QUINCY, PORT OF DISTRICT NO. 1 OF GRANT COUNTY and CRESENT BAR INC.
Kelly et al v. Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00023
Plaintiff: James V Kelly , Lawrence H Cain , H Teresa Cain and others
Defendant: Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County , Port of Quincy, Port District No 1 of Grant County and Crescent Bar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?