Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lardizabal et al v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Aidan Lardizabal and Mayra Alejandra Puentes
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
BENZ-PUENTE v. TRUIST FINANCIAL
as 5:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
GILBERTO BENZ-PUENTE and GILBERTO BENZ-PUENTE, JR.
Defendant:
TRUIST FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NOLTE v. USA FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 5:2021cv03675
Plaintiff:
CAROL NOLTE
Defendant:
ARMANDO PUENTE NAZCO, USA FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. and TRANSPORT FREIGHT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SALGADO PUENTE v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2017cv04779
Plaintiff:
TERESA SALGADO PUENTE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASCIOLI et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT
as 2:2015cv05957
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASCIOLI , SHANE BRANIGAN , BARRY BRESLIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUENTES-CANALES v. WIGGINS
as 3:2014cv00133
Petitioner:
RUDY ISMAEL PUENTES-CANALES
Respondent:
GEORGE WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PUENTE v. CARR et al
as 2:2014cv02852
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PUENTE
Defendant:
ERWIN R. CARR and AGRI-MARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ALEXANDER v. FEENEY et al
as 2:2014cv00889
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
FEENEY, ARNALDO PUENTE, CHRIS R. WOGNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUENTE v. NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, LLC.
as 2:2013cv02604
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PUENTE
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
