Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 95
City of Santa Ana et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Santa Ana City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho and CITY OF SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of San Clemente et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02326
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through San Clemente City Attorney Scott C. Smith and City of San Clemente
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: County of Kern, The People of the State of California, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Alameda, California v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler et al
as 3:2019cv02317
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, an individual and as trustee for TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler and County of Alameda, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019at00309
Defendant: BEVERLY SACKLER, MALLINCKRODT, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Kern County Counsel Margo Raison and County of Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Westminster et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Westminster City Attorney Richard D. Jones and City of Westminster
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte and The People of The State of California
Petitioner: ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
County of San Mateo v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00949
Defendant: Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of San Mateo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?