Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant:
Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marathon Equipment Company (Delaware) v. Quinn (TV2)
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Marathon Equipment Company (Delaware)
Defendant:
Robert Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tarnow v. Quinn et al
as 3:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Tarnow
Defendant:
Xander Quinn and Crystal Dean
Interested Party:
Farmers Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tigner v. Memphis Police Department of Shelby County et al
as 2:2021cv02475
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Tigner, IV
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, J. Waddell, D. Tutera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIPPOHS, LLC v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv02193
Defendant:
Sketches and Pixels, LLC and Quinn Smith
Plaintiff:
HIPPOHS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. White et al
as 2:2021cv02192
Defendant:
Southaven Mississippi Police Department, Joseph Hudgins, Baron W. Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Zara Yaffa Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01136
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
