Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TOWER SYSTEMS, INC. v. R&L CARRIERS, INC.
as 3:2016cv02587
Plaintiff:
TOWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
R&L CARRIERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRESCOTT v. R&L CARRIERS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. PRESCOTT
Defendant:
R&L CARRIERS, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENMAN INC. v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv05611
Plaintiff:
GREENMAN INC.
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
THE CLASSY COOK v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04759
Plaintiff:
THE CLASSY COOK
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHAMPION PARTS, INC. v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04650
Plaintiff:
CHAMPION PARTS, INC.
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PCM COMPANY v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04513
Plaintiff:
PCM COMPANY
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
RUTKOWSKI v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04442
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUTKOWSKI
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
THOMPSON v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv04271
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE F. THOMPSON
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON-WAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
