Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lee v. Patterson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Mariquse McCan, Cieria Wasghington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv05352
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill
Defendant:
TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and TEVA Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch v. Smart et al
as 5:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Billy Welch
Defendant:
Smart, R D Coleman and D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Etherly et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Roland Murray
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Wallace McNary, Dexter L Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromeans v. White et al
as 5:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
Danny A Cromeans, Jr
Defendant:
David White, Laurence E Baker, Jr, Kevin Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. White et al
as 5:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Terry Proctor
Defendant:
David White, R D Bailey, Joyce Gooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Allen et al
as 5:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee
Defendant:
Allen, Diggs, P Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Norris et al
as 5:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerry Perez
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Harris, Waylee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. Spears et al
as 5:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Terry Proctor
Defendant:
Michael Spears, Michael Bieber, Minnie L Drayer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holleman et al v. American Honda Motor Company Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Holleman and Dwayne Holleman
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company Inc, Honda Motor Company Ltd, Honda R & D Company Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
