Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ricardo Dodson v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 21-3778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO DODSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, TRACY THALHEIMER, in her capacity as Chair of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, ELLEN W. VENTERS, member of the Ohio Adult Parole Board and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Brian Alford v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 19-3921
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY SMITH, LORI PETERMAN, ALICE HANDWORK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN K. ALFORD
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Jeffrey Mann v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 15-3709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, GARY CROFT, Warden, BENNIE KELLY, Warden and others
Richard et al v. Mohr et al
as 2:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard, Dennis Calo and Ronald Jolly
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Cynthia B. Mausser, Kathleen Kovach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Thalheimer et al
as 1:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
Norman V. Whiteside
Defendant:
Trayce Thalheimer, Cynthia Mausser, Kathleen Kovach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berk et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
Otto Berk, Jeff Blair and Don Hall
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Linda Jaynes, Cynthia Mausser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morehouse v. Mausser et al
as 2:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
William E. Morehouse
Defendant:
Cynthia B. Mausser, Jim Bedra, Sandra Crockett Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Warden et al
as 2:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Warden, Terry Collins, Cynthia B Mausser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
