Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Supreme Ackbar v. Christopher Monaco
as 20-6872
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, C. EARLY, RIVERA LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary
Brown v. Boccabello et al
as 4:2019cv03587
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown and Niccolo Don Emperor
Defendant:
Ms. S. Williams, Mr. Lewis, Steve McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Michael Stokes v. Bryan P. Stirling et al
as 9:2019cv01992
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Sharon Sims, Michael McCall, Wanda Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Gillespie et al
as 9:2019cv01863
Defendant:
C. Holbrook, R. L. Turner and Richard Gillespie
Plaintiff:
LeRoy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackbar v. Monaco et al
as 4:2019cv01373
Plaintiff:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar and Ronald Gary
Defendant:
Henery McMasters, C. Early, Steven McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadnax v. Turner et al
as 9:2014cv02828
Plaintiff:
Edward Walter Broadnax, III
Defendant:
R L Turner, Daniel Cotter, Bryan P Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plummer v. Hallman et al
as 2:2013cv01791
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Plummer
Defendant:
Ann Hallman and R L Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
O'Martin v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kendrick O'Martin
Defendant:
Arthenia Martin, R L Turner, Mr Mauhabwa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. Byers et al
as 6:2011cv03259
Plaintiff:
Randall Edwin Latimer
Defendant:
Bill Byers, Michael McCall, R L Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
