Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 2:2017cv01198
Plaintiff: Safron Huot
Defendant: Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv22618
Plaintiff: Safron Huot
Defendant: Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 4:2017cv00154
Plaintiff: Safron Huot
Defendant: Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Windle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00764
Plaintiff: Melanie F. McKinney
Defendant: Joseph C. Windle , Christopher R. Martin and The Tallapoosa County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Martin
as 0:2016cv60136
Plaintiff: Preston Hicks
Defendant: Jose R Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02529
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Martin
as 1:2013cv02158
Plaintiff: Thomas R. Martin
Defendant: Gonda M. Martin
Almengor v. The City of Jacksonville We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00116
Plaintiff: Louis Almengor
Defendant: The City of Jacksonville
Movant: William R. Weakley and Kenneth R. Martin
Counter_claimant: The City of Jacksonville
Counter_defendant: Louis Almengor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Martin
as 1:2010cv01644
Plaintiff: Thomas R. Martin
Defendant: Gonda M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?