Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Danny Richards v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 13-2557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, M.D., RICHARD HIRSCHLER, M.D., TARIS GONZALEZ and others
Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc. v. Richards
as 1:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
David R Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dan Richards v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 11-3227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, M.D., RICHARD HIRSCHLER, M.D., TARIS GONZALEZ and others
RICHARDS v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2010cv01583
Defendant:
MS. JANE DOE, N.P., MS. GONZALES, N.P., DR. HIRSCHLER, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. PRS Assets LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jason Dillard
Defendant:
PRS Assets LLC and William R Richards PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Richard v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00506
Petitioner:
Randy R Richard
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
ANGIE JOHNSON, ANGIE JOHNSON and ANGIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LLC, PRS ASSETS, LLC and WILLIAM R. RICHARDS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
