Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felton Love, Jr. v. Rick Hill, et al
as 23-15312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK M. HILL, J. HECKMAN, D. HARRIS and others
(PC) Love v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill, T. Johnson, J. Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
D'Andre R. Rogers, Evan T. Dayton, Jerry McGinnis and others
Defendant:
Warden Truman Mears, Deputy Warden John Beck, Major Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00189
Defendant:
MARK INCH, C A MURPHY, R ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT F RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGAN v. L M MCCRANIE et al
as 3:2019cv03513
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, R ROGERS, L M MCCRANIE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
Rogers v. USA
as 3:2016cv00098
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bruce R. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
