Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: R. S. McCullough, et al
as 11-3400
Appellant:
In re: R. S. McCullough and Darrell F. Brown, Sr.
In Re: R.S. McCullough and Darrell F. Brown Sr.
as 4:2011mc00039
Appellant:
R S McCullough and Darrell F Brown, Sr
R.S. McCullough, et al v. Stark Ligon, et al
as 10-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. S. McCullough and Darrell F. Brown, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Stark Ligon, in his capacity of Executive Director of Arkansas Committee on Professional Conduct, J. Michael Cogbill, in his capacity as Chairman of APCC Panel, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Betty Dickey, in her official capacity as Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court
R.S. McCullough v. Mark Stodola
as 07-3413
Plaintiff:
Leta Anthony, Stephan Pettus, Aretha Ward and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. S. McCullough, On Behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Stodola, Individual and Official Capacity, Tom Carpenter, Individual and Official Capacity, City of Little Rock and others
Defendant:
Kent Walker, Individual and Official Capacity, Ozell Snider, Individual and Official Capacity, Susan Inman, Individual and Official Capacity and others
McCullough v. Fox et al
as 4:2007cv00931
Plaintiff:
R S McCullough
Defendant:
Tim D Fox, Pat O'Brien, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Winstead et al v. Stodola et al
as 4:2007cv00682
Plaintiff:
Nicole Winstead, Stephan Pettus, Aretha Ward and others
Defendant:
Mark Stodola, Tom Carpenter, Little Rock, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
R S McCullough, et al v. Stark Ligon, et al
as 06-2689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. S. McCullough and Darrell F. Brown, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Stark Ligon, in his capacity of Executive Director of Arkansas Committee on Professional Conduct, J. Michael Cogbill, in his capacity as Chairman of APCC Panel, State of Arkansas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
