Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku vs. Wolfe; et al.
as 1:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kabushiki Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku and Yugen Kaisha Nagashima Kikaku
Defendant:
Corrine K. R. Wolfe, Susan Hemmings, Elizabeth Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Piguet et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2016cv61935
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Piguet and Peter N. Archer
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Chase and Company, Ronald R. Wolfe & Assoc. P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Ham, et al v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., et al
as 12-6460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. HAM, JEMONIA L. HAM, DENNIS R. WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HORNE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD L. LOTT and MICHAEL PASCARELLA
Defendant - Appellee:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., DAVID MITCHELL and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM L. GIBBONS, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Safety
Wolffing et al v. Household Bank F.S.B.
as 1:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Wolffing and Mary R. Wolffing
Defendant:
Household Bank F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Williams et al v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Leo Chico Williams, III , Pete Williams , Leo Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc. , Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 4:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leo "Chico&quo Williams, III , Pete Williams , Leo Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience LP, Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc., Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ham et al v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
as 2:2009cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Ham, Michael D. Ham, Jemonia L. Ham and others
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
