Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Javier v. Bode et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Sean Javier
Defendant:
Bode, Dean R. Williams and S. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Mun et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Mun, Wassilie and Kargass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Sidders et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Mattew Sidders, Jason R. Venable, Chrstine B. Joslin and others
Hall et al v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall and Richard R. Blevins
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections and Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Pais et al
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
David R. Ambrose, II
Defendant:
Salvatare Pais, Donald Trump, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Indvick v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
James R. Indvick
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Massey v. Spaan et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Massey, Jr.
Defendant:
Micheal Robin Spaan, Philip R. Volland and Micheal L. Wolverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Warren Wolfe Esq. and The Staff at Rex L. Butler & Asso.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattila v. City of Palmer et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Michael Lynch, Sawyer Skiba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Crimmett et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Crimmett, C.O. & Goose Creek Correctional Center Official's, McCormeik and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
