Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Secretary of Labor v. Macy's, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00541
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Macy's, Inc., Macy's, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta and Secretary of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. CSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
CSP, Inc. , Raj Patel 1, Inc. , Mehul Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Hilty et al
as 3:2017mc00047
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Mervin M. Hilty and Walter M. Hilty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Filing Error
as 3:2017cv01709
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Mervin M. Hilty and Walter M Hilty
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Acosta v. Katana Buffet & Grill, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01609
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Katana Buffet & Grill, Inc. and Hui Min Wu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Acosta v. Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hibachi Grill and Sushi Buffet, Inc. and Li Yong Dong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Pine River Healthcare, LLC
as 2:2017cv12321
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Pine River Healthcare, LLC
Acosta v. Fremont Healthcare LLC
as 1:2017cv00644
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Fremont Healthcare LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Acosta v. Rotondo et al
as 2:2017cv11991
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Dino Rotondo, Apex Administrative Services, LLC and People Plus Multiple Employer 401(k) Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Caring Nurses of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv11816
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Caring Nurses of Michigan, Inc., Florentina Wood and Caring Nurses of Michigan, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
