Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Barnes v. Barnes
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Bianca R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
KC Turbos LLC v. Turbo Charger Systems Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
KC Turbos LLC
Defendant:
Turbo Charger Systems Incorporated, Kent R Barnes, Jr. and Unknown Barnes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Martin Arnaudov, et al v. Todor Kitchukov, et al
as 22-15835
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTIN ARNAUDOV, IVAN VELICHKOV, MIHAIL SLAVKOV and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODOR KITCHUKOV and MARIANA KITCHUKOV
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DELTA MECHANICAL, INC., a corporation, DETA MECHANICAL, INC., a corporation, NEVADA DELTA MECHANICAL, INC., a corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
BMO HARRIS BANK NA, Garnishee, FIRST CONVENIENCE BANK, Garnishee, ARIZONA BANK & TRUST, Garnishee and others
Motley v. State of California
as 4:2020cv05361
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, A. Neilson, D. Blackburn and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Motley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Flores v. R. Barne
as 18-55344
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
R. BARNES, Warden
Barnes v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01823
Plaintiff:
Vernon R. Barnes
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Henderson v. Barnes, et al.
as 2:2015cv01826
Plaintiff:
Lamond Henderson
Defendant:
R. Barnes, Harper, Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Barnes et al
as 1:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Lamond Henderson
Defendant:
R. Barnes, Harper, Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Barnes
as 3:2015cv01260
Petitioner:
Earnest S. Harris
Respondent:
R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Gutierrez v. Barnes, et al.
as 2:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gutierrez
Defendant:
R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.