Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Duncan v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv05622
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Petitioner:
Franklin R Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duncan et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01661
Plaintiff:
Vernon R Duncan , Gena Duncan , Jeremy Duncan and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fregia v. St. Clair et al
as 1:2016cv01866
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Fregia
Defendant:
J St. Clair, R. Duncan, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Tesluk et al
as 2:2016cv02268
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eddis Moore
Defendant:
G. Tesluk, P. Nguyen, H. Win and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Lewis et al.
as 1:2016cv00989
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. St. Clair, R. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Lewis et al.
as 2:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. St. Clair, R. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Beard et al
as 1:2016cv00133
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, John Clark Kelso , Kelly Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southern California Institute v. The State of Bar of California, et al
as 14-55690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, JAMES H. AGUIRRE, individually and in his official capacity and others
Duncan v. Bank of America, NA, FNA
as 6:2012cv01154
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, FNA
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Duncan
Amicu:
Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc and US Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duncan v. Tillman
as 3:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
Tom R. Duncan
Defendant:
Tillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
