Cases 1 - 10 of 12
R.E. v. Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04390
Plaintiff:
R. E.
Defendant:
Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. v. R&E Diamonds LLC
as 1:2017cv09489
Plaintiff:
Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd.
Defendant:
R&E Diamonds LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Villar Nunez et al v. R & E Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Luis R. Villar Nunez
Defendant:
R & E Corp. and Angel R. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Woodward v. Holtzman et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Holtzman, E. Rice, R. E. Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Alan's R E 99 Cents & Up Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01881
Defendant:
Alan's R E 99 Cents & Up Inc, Jenny Yang's R E 99 Cent Store, Long Yang Jiang and others
Plaintiff:
Prospero Justo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
J.D. et al v. New York City Department Of Education,
as 1:2014cv04261
Plaintiff:
J. D. , L. D. , R. E. and others
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education,
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
In Re: In re AOL Time Warn, et al v. , et al
as 1:2002cv06302
Plaintiff:
Chuck Hall , Harding Willinger , William Fullerton and others
Defendant:
Stephen M. Case, Michael F. Kelly, Richard D. Parsons and others
Objector:
David Badzik
Pecial_master:
David H. Pikus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
