Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hunter v. May et al
as 3:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Mr. Watters, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hunter v. Sterling Mtg & Investment Co., et al
as 21-1496
Defendant / Appellee:
STERLING MORTGAGE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. HUNTER
Hunter v. Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company et al
as 2:2019cv13814
Defendant:
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company and United States of America - Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company v. Hunter
as 2:2018cv11537
Defendant:
Charles R. Hunter
Plaintiff:
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Hunter v United States of America, et al
as 2:2017cv13494
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Hunter
Defendant:
United States of America, Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company and Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
United States of America v. Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company et al
as 2:2017cv12281
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company , Charles R Hunter, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Foglia v. Hunter et al
as 1:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Foglia
Defendant:
Taylor Hunter, Joseph R. Hunter, Vince Nystrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv14490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
