Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ROTH v. PALLOWSKI et al
as 5:2017cv01636
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. ROTH
Defendant:
EDWARD PALLOWSKI, CITY OF ALLENTOWN, EDWARD SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Sempa et al
as 3:2016cv01028
Plaintiff:
Featherstone R. James
Defendant:
Francis P. Sempa and Peter J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv65297
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J JAMES, JR. and ERMA R JAMES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv06635
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA R. JAMES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JAMES et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75040
Plaintiff:
TOMMY R. JAMES, SR., TOMMY R. JAMES, SR., BONNIE D. JAMES and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WADHWA et al v. NICHOLSON
as 2:2009cv02602
Plaintiff:
DOM WADHWA and SHARON A. FINIZIE
Defendant:
R. JAMES NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
JAMES et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90613
Plaintiff:
SMITH R. JAMES and EMMA L. SMITH
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC., GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JAMES v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64872
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. JAMES and WILLIAM R. JAMES
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
