Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harpole v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jackson Harpole
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Collette Peters, Erin Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Ellis v. Hammon, et al
as 21-35312
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCH, C.O. TRCI, HAMMON, C.O. OSP, HOUSTON, Lt. TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON MICHAEL ELLIS
Ellis v. Hammon et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toland v. Persson
as 3:2017cv00752
Respondent:
R. Persson
Petitioner:
Linda Toland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kyte v. Perssons
as 3:2016cv01206
Petitioner:
Megan Kyte
Respondent:
R. Perssons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Comes et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
Shawn W. Comes , James N. Comes , Klatt Dairy Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fort v. Persson
as 6:2013cv02094
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Fort
Respondent:
R. Persson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sundeen v. Persson
as 6:2013cv01769
Respondent:
R. Persson
Petitioner:
Timothy M. Sundeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Blocker v. Aaron Felton, et al
as 12-35742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE BLOCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON D. FELTON, Chairperson, Board of Parole, UNKNOWN DIRECTORS OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY POST PRISON SUPERVISION, R. PERSSON, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution and others
Blocker v. Felton et al
as 3:2012cv01522
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Blocker
Defendant:
Aaron D. Felton, R. Persson, Rioux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
