Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lane v. Lechuga et al
as 1:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Ladell Lane
Defendant:
S Lechuga, E Villarreal, R Rodriguez 02 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01834
Plaintiff:
PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ralphlaurenpoloshirts.us.org, ZZSLHL Luggage&Bags Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
A.R. v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06285
Plaintiff:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Arman R Rodriguez and A.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strickland v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07045
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, City Of Chicago, J. Motesdeoca and others
Plaintiff:
Vairrun Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruffin v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Plaintiff:
David Ruffin
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Eddie Johnson, R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bahena v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv08532
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , M. Kennedy , W. Fiedler and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Bahena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberts v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv05903
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alberts
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart, Tamez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberts v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv04114
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alberts
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart, Tamez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Martin Contreras
Defendant:
Tom Dart, R. Rodriguez, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Reierson et al
as 1:2014cv08957
Plaintiff:
Ned James
Defendant:
Eric Reierson, R Rodriguez, D. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
