Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FUNK v. RUSSELL
as 2:2019cv04401
Defendant:
ELIZABETH R. RUSSELL
Plaintiff:
DONALD FUNK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTCHEL v. KARLIN et al
as 2:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. SCOTCHEL, JR.
Defendant:
ALLAN N. KARLIN , JESSICA H. DONAHUE RHODES, RACHAEL L. FLETCHER CIPOLETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv06800
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv05616
Plaintiff:
BERTRAM R. RUSSELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RUSSELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57125
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. RUSSELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MENGEL et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv00892
Plaintiff:
LARRY M. MENGEL and WILLIAM R. RUSSELL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSSELL et al v. ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv01088
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL R. RUSSELL , MARY ELLEN RUSSELL and KEAVEN D. RUSSELL
Defendant:
ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA , RICK MILLER , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
RUSSELL v. SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD et al
as 2:2009cv75070
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. RUSSELL
Defendant:
SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD, ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD and GEORGIA AND FLORIDA RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUSSELL v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2007cv61188
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. RUSSELL and NANCY RUSSELL
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA INC., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA INC., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
