Cases 21 - 30 of 59
LEWIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
ERIC LEWIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 2:2015cv04899
Petitioner:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARK I. BERNSTEIN, R. SETH WILLIAMS, EVAN SILVERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Talbert v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 15-2800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS, ADAM JACKSON and others
ALLAH v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv03516
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH RASUL-SHABAZZ ALLAH
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, KATHLEEN KANE and BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OTTO et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv03217
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. OTTO , MICHAEL SPICER , BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIRCH v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2015cv02626
Petitioner:
GERALD W. BIRCH
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN, R. SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01718
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
GARY WALKER
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APONTE v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2015cv00561
Petitioner:
EDWIN APONTE
Respondent:
JAMES A. ECKARD, R. SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARKSDALE v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2015cv00489
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P MAHALLY, KATHLEEN KANE and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
