Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Postell v. Breaux et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
T . Johnson, Doretta R Watson, Justin K Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Asberry Barry Postell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson et al v. SPS Select Portfolio Inc et al
as 4:2015cv00990
Plaintiff:
John R. Watson and Valerie A. Watson
Defendant:
SPS SELECT PORTFOLIO INC , Tim Obrien , US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Watson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01857
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Watson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Watson et al v. Watson et al
as 4:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kathryn A Watson and Steven R Watson
Defendant:
Eric Watson, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Courtney Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Watson v. United States Of America
as 6:2011cv00132
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Adam R. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Watson v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2010cv03203
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Watson
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
