Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Wiley v Shopko Stores Operating Co LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03322
Plaintiff:
Michelle R. Wiley
Defendant:
Shopko Stores Operating Co LLC , Shopko Holding Company Inc and Spirit SPE Portfolio 2006-1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Wiley, et al
as 11-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, Warden, ADX Florence, H. LAPPIN and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Zaring v. Wiley
as 11-1036
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY MARK ZARING
Respondent - Appellee:
R. WILEY, Warden, Federal Prison Camp Florence
Lynn v. Cox et al
as 1:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Lynn
Defendant:
W. Cox, J. Boley, J. Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Wiley, et al
as 10-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, Warden, ADX Florence, H. LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 10-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Reid v. Wiley, et al
as 10-1279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD REID
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, Mr., Warden Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. GONZALES, Mr., United States Attorney General and H. WATTS, Mr., General Counsel Federal Bureau of Prisons
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Bustos v. A&E Television Networks, et al
as 10-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEE BUSTOS
Defendant - Appellee:
A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARRELL WATTS, individually and as Administrator, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Wiley v. Miller et al
as 6:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Charles R Wiley
Defendant:
Warden Miller, CO Williams, CO Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
