Cases 1 - 10 of 10
R.C.C. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as OHS/2:22-CV-03770
Plaintiff:
R.C.C.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc
Arrowood Indemnity Company v. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York et al
as 1:2020cv06281
Plaintiff:
Arrowood Indemnity Company and Royal Indemnity Company
Defendant:
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York, Cathedral Preparatory School, Nazareth High School and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Frieszell v. R.C.C./D.O.C.
as 5:2020cv00434
Petitioner:
Michael Eirshel Frieszell
Respondent:
R.C.C./D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00599
Defendant:
Medical Staff (R.C.C.), Dept. of Corrections and Roederer Correctional
Plaintiff:
Ricky Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frieszell v. R.C.C./D.O.C.
as 3:2020cv00592
Petitioner:
Michael Frieszell
Respondent:
R.C.C./D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
M.M.V. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02773
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Andrew Davidson, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Plaintiff:
MMV, L.P.E., I.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Andrew Davenport v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 15-31101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT TANNER, Warden, Rayburn Correctional Center, CASEY MCVEA, Doctor, R.C.C., JEFF WILLIAMS, Corrections Major, R.C.C. and others
Jesse Morman v. Louisiana Supreme Court, et al
as 09-30932
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE L MORMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT and TANNER, at R.C.C.
R.C.C. Ventures, LLC v. Prime Revenue Inc.
as 1:2009cv07874
Plaintiff:
R.C.C. Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Prime Revenue Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jesse Morman v. Louisiana Supreme Court, et al
as 09-30598
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE L MORMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT and TANNER, at R.C.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
