Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Brown, et al v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, et al
as 24-8001
Respondent: KEVIN BROWN, individually and as natural parent and next friend of G.B. and D.B., CHRISTOPHER BLUNDON, individually and as natural parent and next friend of A.B. and Z.B., THERESA BROWN, individually and as natural parent and next friend of G.B. and D.B. and others
Plaintiff: ADAM W. DYER, BRIAN MENDEZ, individually and as natural parent and personal represenative for M.M., BRENDA MORSE and others
Petitioner: SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION and GWENAEL BUSNEL
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant: BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party: BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Movant - Appellant: SARAH COLE, FADHAL MOORE, ARJINI KUMARI NAWAL and others
Mandeville v. Thompson
as 14-1459
Petitioner - Appellant: R.H. MANDEVILLE
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL A. THOMPSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?