Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Franklin v. Racine County et al
as 2:2026cv01275
Plaintiff:
Tony C Franklin
Defendant:
Racine County, Nurse Arline, CO Villagranna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nakreisha McFarland v. Tasha King, et al
as 26-2451
Plaintiff:
NAKREISHA MCFARLAND
Defendant:
TASHA KING, KRYSTAL ELLIS, STEPHEN CALMER and others
Streeter v. Vandervest et al
as 2:2026cv01202
Plaintiff:
Shaqueta T Streeter
Defendant:
Donald Vandervest, Brian Vanscyoc, Tracy L Hintz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Racine County Circuit Courts et al
as 2:2026cv01122
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
Racine County Circuit Courts and Judge Faye M Flancher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals 2nd District et al
as 2:2026cv00967
Petitioner:
Henry Lee White
Respondent:
Wisconsin Court of Appeals 2nd District, Racine County Circuit Court and State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Yeoman v. Jon Fry, et al
as 26-1917
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. YEOMAN
Defendant:
JON FRY, WILLIAM EMBREY, RACINE COUNTY and others
A E v. Racine County et al
as 2:2026cv00752
Defendant:
Racine County, Robert Knight and Jordan Knight
Plaintiff:
A E
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McFarland v. King et al
as 2:2026cv00448
Plaintiff:
Nakreisha McFarland
Defendant:
Tasha King, Stephen Calmer, Krystal Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
