Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto v. Kirk Richard Berry
as 2:2021cv08607
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto
Defendant:
Kirk Richard Berry and Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Gonzalez v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00522
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Abel De Luna v. Jose De Jesus Navarrro et al
as 5:2018cv02261
Defendant:
Andres Rodriguez, Ernesto Zamora, Guillermo Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Abel De Luna
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Gonzalez et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2012cv02474
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez and Leticia Gonzalez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Schmidt Mortgage Corporation, The Helfing Law Firm, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rafael Gonzalez v. Scott McEwen
as 8:2011cv01595
Petitioner:
Rafael Gonzalez
Respondent:
Scott McEwen
Mejia et al v. Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01396
Defendant:
Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. and International Garden Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teofilio Mejia , Margarito Ibarra , Alfonso Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Mejia et al v. Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. et al
as 1:2010at00573
Defendant:
Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc., International Garden Products, Inc. and Margarito Ibarra
Plaintiff:
Teofilio Mejia , alfonso rivera , sergio vega and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rafael Gonzalez et al v. City of Anaheim et al
as 2:2010cv04660
Defendant:
City of Anaheim and Does
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez and Rafael Gonzalez
Gonzalez et al v. FreshPoint, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez and Cesar Gomez
Defendant:
FreshPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rafael Gonzalez v. Fernandez Gonzalez
as 2:2009cv04127
Petitioner:
Rafael Gonzalez
Respondent:
Fernando Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
