Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Ramirez v. Northeast New Mexico Detention Facility, et al
as 23-2195
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMON RAMIREZ
Respondent:
NORTHEAST NEW MEXICO DETENTION FACILITY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
RAMIREZ v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
RAMONE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, DEPUTY WARDEN HOLMAN and COUNSELOR HEATHER MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
RAMONE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, MICHAEL HOLLMAN, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Klauss Lundin Arangua v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
Klauss Lundin Arangua
Defendant:
County of Riverside, County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ramirez-Lopez
as 22-10339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMIREZ-LOPEZ, AKA Ramon Ramirez-Lopez
Silva v. Strange
as 4:2022cv05112
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramirez Silva
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Torres v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00763
Petitioner:
Ramon Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lane v. Axelhire Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Khalif Lane
Defendant:
Axelhire Incorporated, Daniel Sokolovsky, Ramon Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ramirez v. United States
as 1:2021cv00979
Petitioner:
Luis Ramon Ramirez
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Orellana v. Garland
as 21-60600
Petitioner:
Jose Ramon Ramirez-Orellana
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
