Cases 1 - 10 of 42
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRKLAND v. DISALVO et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
TAVON THOMAS KIRKLAND
Defendant:
MR. DISALVO, MR. SCHERER, MR. CAVALIERE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. RANKIN
as 5:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
DEPUTY SHERRIFF RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
William Rankins
Defendant:
Michael Gourley, Bradley Ritchey and Rachel Misiti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burk v. Rankins et al
as 4:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Ali Burk
Defendant:
Lt. Rankins, Counselor Showalter, Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PALUCH et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv00720
Defendant:
SGT. TYNER, GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. and WILLIE M. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ERIE TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. SCI SMITHFIELD et al
as 1:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
Juwan Mitchell
Defendant:
SCI Smithfield, Rankin, Andrew Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
