Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vyas v. Morris et al
as 7:2023cv00216
Defendant:
Kelly Warner, Chad Morris, Alycia Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2021cv00096
Defendant:
United States District Court, Thomas R. Cahill, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Elliott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell et al v. Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01347
Plaintiff:
John E. Harrell and Dawn D. Harrell
Defendant:
Brendan Muha, Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC and Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC doing business as TTR Sotheby's International Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rankins v. Farmville City et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Farmville City, Prince Edwards County, Peidmont Reginonal Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. Metropolitan Aviation, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Rankin
Defendant:
Metropolitan Aviation, LLC and Alan Russell Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rankins v. Scott et al
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rankins
Defendant:
G. Scott, Denny Hatchon and Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Oxley et al
as 1:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rankins
Defendant:
C. S. Oxley, Dwayne Williams and Houston Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Rankin et al
as 1:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Henry R. Robinson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lynn Rankin and DelHaize America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Johnson v. Rankin
as 2:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jerrell R. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephen D. Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Belfield v. Rankin
as 1:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Karl Thomas Belfield
Defendant:
S. D. Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
